Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia
Abstract
With declining population and fertility rates below replacement levels, Russia is currently facing a demographic crisis. Starting in 2007, the federal government has pursued an ambitious pro-natalist policy. Women who give birth to at least two children are entitled to “maternity capital” assistance ($11,000). In this paper we estimate a structural dynamic programming model of fertility and labor force participation in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy. We find that the program increased long-run fertility by about 0.15 children per woman.
Downloads
References
Arroyo C., J. Zhang (1997). Dynamic microeconomic models of fertility choice: a survey. // J. Popul. Econ. 100 (1): 23–65.
Becker G.S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries // Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Series 11. NBER, Princeton, NJ, pp. 209–231.
Becker G. (2006). Grappling with Russia's Demographic Time Bomb // The Becker-Posner Blog. http://www.becker-posner-blog.com.
Bertrand M., E. Duflo, S. Mullainathan (2004). How much should we trust differences-indifferences estimates? // Q. J. Econ. 1190 (1): 249–275.
Brainerd E. (2012). The demographic transformation of post-socialist countries: causes, consequences, and questions // In: G. Roland, ed. Economies in Transition: The Long-Run View. Palgrave Macmillan: 57–83.
Chen D. (2011). Can countries reverse fertility decline? Evidence from France's marriage and baby bonuses, 1929–1981 // Int. Tax Public Financ. 180 (3): 253–272.
Cohen A., R. Dehejia, D. Romanov (2013). Financial incentives and fertility // Rev. Econ. Stat. 950 (1): 1–20.
Denisova I., J. Shapiro (2013). Recent demographic developments in the Russian Federation // In: M. Alexeev, S. Weber, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy, Chapter 33. Oxford University Press: 800–826.
Dickert-Conlin S., A. Chandra (1999). Taxes and the timing of births // J. Polit. Econ. 1070 (1): 161–177.
Francesconi M. (2002). A Joint dynamic model of fertility and work of married women // J. Labor Econ. 200 (2): 336–380.
Gans J., A. Leigh (2009). Born on the first of July: an (un)natural experiment in birth timing // J. Public Econ. 930 (1–2): 246–263.
González L. (2013). The effect of a universal child benefit on conceptions, abortions, and early maternal labor supply // Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 50 (3): 160–188.
Hotz V.J, R.A. Miller (1988). An empirical analysis of life cycle fertility and female labor supply. Econometrica 560 (1), 91–118.
Hotz V.J., J. Klerman, R. Willis (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries // In: M.R. Rosenzweig, O. Stark, eds. Handbook of Population and Family Economics, vol. IA. Elsevier Science: 275–347.
Keane M., K. Wolpin (2007). Exploring the usefulness of a nonrandom holdout sample for model validation: welfare effects on female behavior // Int. Econ. Rev. 480 (4): 1351–1378.
Keane, M., Wolpin, K., 2010. The role of labor and marriage markets, preference heterogeneity, and the welfare system in the life cycle decisions of black, Hispanic, and white women. Int. Econ. Rev. 510 (3), 851–892.
Keane M.P., P.E. Todd, K.I. Wolpin (2011). The structural estimation of behavioral models: discrete choice dynamic programming methods and applications // Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4. Elsevier: 331–461 (chapter 4).
McFadden D. (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration // Econometrica 570 (5): 995–1026.
Milligan K. (2005). Subsidizing the stork: new evidence on tax incentives and fertility // Rev. Econ. Stat. 870 (3): 539–555.
Naseleniye Rossii 2010-2011. Vosemnadtsatyy-devyatnadtsatyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Population of Russia 2010-2011. Eighteenth-Nineteenth annual demographic report] (2013) / A.G.Vishnevsky, ed. M .: HSE Publishing House.
Naseleniye Rossii 2012. Dvadtsatyy yezhegodnyy demograficheskiy doklad [Population of Russia 2012. Twentieth annual demographic report] (2014) / A.G.Vishnevsky, ed. M .: HSE Publishing House.
Slonimczyk F., A. Yurko (2013). Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia using a dynamic model of fertility and employment // Discussion Paper 7705IZA.
Slonimczyk F., A.Yurko (2014). Assessing the impact of the maternity capital policy in Russia. Labour Economics 30 (2014): 265-281.
Zaharov S.V. (2012). Rost rozhdaemosti v 2007-2010 godah: est' li povod dlja optimizma? // Demoskop Weekly, № 495 - 496. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0495/tema01.php.
Wolpin K. (1984). An estimable dynamic stochastic model of fertility and child mortality // J. Polit. Econ. 92: 852–874.
