Some problems of assessing population losses during collectivization

  • Сергей Максудов Davis Center for Russian and East European Studies, Harvard University
Keywords: population census, collectivization, population losses

Abstract

After the opening of the Soviet archives in the late 1980s, many researchers found the results of the 1939 census unreliable. Those who conducted the census recalled the sad fate of those who had organised the census of 1937, which was found to be flawed.They understood that the government wanted to see a large population represented in their results.

That’s why they decided to falsify the results. Our research shows that the major efforts that were put into a precise execution of the census did not go to waste. And the hundreds of census-takers, who were expected to find every person who lived in their district, tried their best to carry out their work with care. Study of the archive materials reveal how, during processing, results were handed to the government and made public by the country's leadership.

The study shows that the census of 1939 was accurate, and more reliable than those which had come before and after. And even a one percent adjustment to the figure which represents the population size, carried out seemingly without good reason, is not an error, because the number of people who avoided the census (due to their criminal past, lack of local registration, illness or other reasons) certainly exceeds 1%.

But any change to the estimate of the population losses should be avoided, since it was not included in prior censuses, and to acquire reliable results it is necessary that the data used have equal accuracy. In our census we also chose not to include those who met with the census-taker outside their home, and then wrongly stated their place of permanent residence in the test form. Thus, the size of the population in the 1939 census is considered at 2 million less than in the TsSU’s Soviet-era publications. In order to reach the same approximate level of reliability across the census results it was necessary to include certain corrections in the census of 1926 (due to lack of test forms, varying census lengths in cities and villages, and also due to undercount in the census of underage children) and 1937 (due to a different method of execution). The changes made allow for a more reliable assessment of the USSR’s losses from collectivisation and repression in the period 1929-1939.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andreev E.M., L.Yu. Darskiy, T.L. Kharkova (1993). Naseleniye Sovetskogo Soyuza. 1922-1991 [The population of the Soviet Union. 1922-1991]. Moscow: Nauka.

Conquest R. (1986). The Harvest of sorrow: Soviet collectivization and the terror-famine. Oxford University Press.

Davies R.W., S.G. Wheatcroft (2004). The years of hunger: soviet agriculture, 1931-1933. Great Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Demograficheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii 1900-2000 [Demographic modernization of Russia 1900-2000] (2006) / A. Vishnevsy, ed. Moscow: Novoye izdatel'stvo.

Dokladnaya zapiska Leningradskogo UNKHU o nedouchete naseleniya v khode Vsesoyuznoy perepisi naseleniya 1937 g. po Leningradu i Leningradskoy oblasti [Staff report of Leningrad UNKhU about the population underwstimation in the 1937 All-Union census in Leningrad and Leningrad region] (1991) // Vsesoyuznaya perepis' naseleniya 1937 g. Kratkiye itogi. (Sbornik dokumentov) [Brief results (Collection of documents)]. Moscow.

Itogi Vsesoyuznoy perepisi naseleniya 1959 goda [The results of the All-Union census of 1959] (1962). Moscow: Statistika

Itogi Vsesoyuznoy perepisi naseleniya 1970 goda [The results of the All-Union population census of 1970] (1972). T.1 Moscow: Statistika

Itogi Vsesoyuznoy perepisi naseleniya 1979 goda [The results of the All-Union population census of 1989] (1989) . T.1. Moscow: Statistika

Lorimer F. (1946). The population of the Soviet Union: History and prospects. Geneva. League of Nations.

Maksudov S. (1987). Diskussiya na Zapade o poteryakh sovetskogo naseleniya v gody kollektivizatsii [Discussion in the West about the Soviet population losses during the collectivization]. Minuvsheye, № 4: 369-392.

Narodnoye khozyaystvo SSSR [The national economy of the USSR] (1956). Statisticheskiy sbornik. Moscow: Statistika.

Narodonaseleniye stran mira [Population of the world] (1978). Spravochnik. Moscow: Statistika.

Naseleniye SSSR [Population of the USSR] (1974). Spravochnik. Moscow: Statistika.

Naseleniye SSSR 1973 [Population of the USSR in 1973] (1975). Statisticheskiy sbornik. Moscow: Statistika.

RGAE [Russian State Archive of Economy]. F. 1562. Op. 329. Yed.khr. 144.

Tragediya sovetskoy derevni. Kollektivizatsiya i raskulachivaniye. Dokumenty i materialy. 1927-1939 [The tragedy of the Soviet countryside. Collectivization and dispossession. Documents and materials. 1927-1939] (2001). T. 3. Konets 1930 - 1933. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

TSGANKH [Central State Archive of the Soviet economy]. F. 1562. Op. 336-337. Yed.khr. 95.

TSSU [Central Statistical Office] (1964). Papka №2. Arkhiv Goskomstata.

Wheatcroft S. (2001). O demograficheskikh svidetel'stvakh tragedii sovetskoy derevni v 1931—1933 gg. [On the demographic evidence of the tragedy of the Soviet countryside in 1931-1933 gg] // Tragediya sovetskoy derevni. Kollektivizatsiya i raskulachivaniye. Dokumenty i materialy [The tragedy of the Soviet countryside. Collectivization and dispossession. Documents and materials.]. 1927-1939. Moscow: ROSSPEN. T. 3: 866-887.

Zemskov V.N. (2003). Spetsposelentsy v SSSR 1930-1960 [Deportees in the USSR 1930-1960]. Moscow.

Zhiromskaya V.B. (1992). Vsesoyuznaya perepis' naseleniya 1939 g. Istoriya provedeniya, otsenka dostovernosti [1939 All-Union census. History of implementation, assessment of reliability] // Vsesoyuznaya perepis' naseleniya 1939 goda. Osnovnyye itogi [1939All-Union census. Main results]. Moscow.

Published
2016-02-12
How to Cite
МаксудовС. (2016). Some problems of assessing population losses during collectivization. Demographic Review, 2(3), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v2i3.1777
Section
Historical demography