Trends in regional fertility differentiation during the second demographic transition

  • Nikolai Stadnik Federal State Statistics Service
Keywords: second demographic transition, fertility, regional fertility differentials, total fertility rate, mean age at childbearing

Abstract

Regional fertility differentiation is a significant factor of regional inequality in the long term. As previous studies show, the first demographic transition in developed countries, which was accompanied by the development of public institutions and means of communication, resulted in a surge in regional fertility differentiation followed by an unprecedented decrease.

In this study, an attempt is made to trace the trends of regional fertility differentiation that can be observed during the second demographic transition, when there is both an increasing normalization of the diversity of forms of family life and an increasing unification of society in terms of information about new practices in this area. For this purpose, five countries were selected. In each of them the trends associated with the second demographic transition began to emerge under different circumstances and at different times.

The study is based on an analysis of the regional variation of two indicators – the total fertility rate and the mean age at childbearing. The source of this information is the data of national statistical services. The methodology of this research includes statistical methods (analysis of variance, variation statistics) and a cartographic analysis of spatial patterns.

The study showed that in some cases there is a surge in regional variation of fertility rates, but this is more likely due to the completion of the first demographic transition. In the case of the birth calendar, the situation is different. The growth of the variation of the mean age of the mother is more stretched out over time. At the same time, the earlier the second demographic transition begins in a country, the slower the reduction in regional diversity of the age profile of fertility – in the USA and France the variation is still growing. A significant role in the formation of regional contrasts, both in the case of the total fertility rate at the early stages and in the case of the mean age at childbearing throughout the studied period, is played by the relations between «avant-garde» regions, usually formed around large developed centers, and the «catching up» periphery, while ethnic and linguistic boundaries appear almost nowhere but in the USA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Захаров С.В., Иванова Е.И. (1996). Региональная дифференциация рождаемости в России: 1959-1994 гг. Проблемы прогнозирования, 4, 109-130.

Захаров С.В. (2014). Региональное разнообразие рождаемости после 2006 г. возросло. В А.Г. Вишневский (Ред.), Население России 2012. Двадцатый ежегодный демографический доклад (сс. 158-173). Москва: Издательский дом ВШЭ.

Вишневский А.Г. (2014). Демографическая революция меняет репродуктивную стратегию вида Homo sapiens. Демографическое обозрение, 1(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v1i1.1825

Казенин К.И., Козлов В.А. (2016). Омоложение материнства в Дагестане: тенденция или артефакт? (Предварительные результаты обследования сельского населения). Демографическое обозрение, 3(3), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v3i3.1748

Abe Y. (2013). Regional variations in labor force behavior of women in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 28, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2013.08.004

Bongaarts J., Watkins S.C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804

CDC (2022). National Vital Statistics Reports. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/nvsr.htm

DANE (2022a). National, departmental and municipal estimates and population projections by sex, five-year groups and individual ages from 0 to 26 (1985-2020). http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/poblacion/proyepobla06_20/Edades_Simples_1985-2020.xls

DANE (2022b). Datos de nacimientos en Colombia. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/salud/nacimientos-y-defunciones/nacimientos

e-Stat (2022). Natality. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00450011&tstat=000001028897&cycle=7&tclass1=000001053058&tclass2=000001053061&tclass3=000001053064&tclass4val=0

Franklin R.S. (2002). Fertility Convergence Across Italy’s Regions, 1952-1995. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting, Western Regional Science Association, Monterey, CA, February 2002.

Frejka T., Westoff C.F. (2008). Religion, Religiousness and Fertility in the US and in Europe: Religion. European Journal of Population, 24(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9121-y

Fuguitt G.V., Beale C.L., Reibel M. (2010). Recent trends in metropolitan-nonmetropolitan fertility. Rural Sociology, 56(3), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00444.x

Guo Z., Wu Z., Schimmele C.M., Li S. (2012). The Effect of Urbanization on China’s Fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 31(3), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-012-9230-0

Hippe R., Perrin F. (2017). Gender equality in human capital and fertility in the European regions in the past. Investigaciones de Historia Económica, 13(3), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihe.2017.02.001

Human Fertility Database (2023). Mean age at first birth. https://www.humanfertility.org/File/GetDocumentFree/Docs/HFDLite/MAB1.xlsx

INE (2022a). Births by mother's place of residence, sex and mother's age. National total and provinces. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=6508

INE (2022b). Resident population by date, sex and age. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=56957

Inglehart R. (2007). Postmaterialist Values and the Shift from Survival to Self-Expression Values. Oxford University Press EBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0012

INSEE (2023). Births and fertility. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/series/102928992

Jeffery R., Jeffery P. (2000). Religion and Fertility in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(35/36), 3253–3259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4409693

Kotzamanis B., Duquesne M.-N. (2004). Les disparités démographiques départementales en Grèce: Convergence ou divergence ? Espace Populations Sociétés, 2004/3, 641–664. https://doi.org/10.4000/eps.3458

Lerch M. (2019). Fertility decline in urban and rural areas of developing countries. Population and Development Review, 45(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12220

Lesthaeghe R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and development review, 36(2), 211-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x

Lesthaeghe R., López-Gay A. (2013). Spatial continuities and discontinuities in two successive demographic transitions: Spain and Belgium, 1880-2010. Demographic Research, 28(4), 77–136. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.4

Lesthaeghe R., Neels K. (2002). From the First to the Second Demographic Transition: An Interpretation of the Spatial Continuity of Demographic Innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population, 18(4), 325–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070

Miettinen A., Basten S., Rotkirch A. (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24, 469-496. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20

Mills M., Begall K., Mencarini L., Tanturri M.L. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.1

Mussino E., Cantalini S. (2022). Influences of origin and destination on migrant fertility in Europe. Population, Space and Place, 28(7), e2567. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2567

Myrskylä, M., Kohler HP, Billari F. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460, 741–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08230

O’Connell M. (1981). Regional fertility patterns in the United States: Convergence or divergence? International Regional Science Review, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001768100600101

Tomka B. (2002). Demographic diversity and convergence in Europe, 1918-1990: The Hungarian case. Demographic Research, 6, 19–48. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.2

Tsuya N.O. (2015). Below-replacement fertility in Japan: Patterns, factors, and policy implications. In R. R. Rindfuss & M. K. Choe (Eds.), Low and Lower Fertility: Variations across Developed Countries (pp. 87–106). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21482-5_5

Volant S., Pison G., Héran F. (2019). French fertility is the highest in Europe. Because of its immigrants? Population Societies, 568(7), 1-4.

Watkins S.C. (1990). From local to national communities: The transformation of demographic regimes in Western Europe, 1870-1960. Population and Development Review, 16(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1971590

Watkins S.C. (1991). From provinces into nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870-1960. Princeton University Press.

Yavuz S. (2006). Completing the fertility transition: Third birth developments by language groups in Turkey. Demographic Research, 15, 435-460. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.15

Zakharov S. (1992). La Transition démographique en Russie et l’evolution des disparités demographiques régionales. In A. Blum, N. Bonneuil et D. Blanchet (Eds.), Modèles de la démographique historique (pp. 353-370). Paris: INED.

Published
2023-08-01
How to Cite
Stadnik N. (2023). Trends in regional fertility differentiation during the second demographic transition . Demographic Review, 10(2), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v10i2.17764
Section
Original papers