Social differences in household structures in the 19th century: Moscow and its outskirts
Abstract
During the last few decades ideas about household structures in the territories lying east of the Hajnal line have changed considerably. Not only has the line itself been transformed into a fairly wide ‘transitional’ zone and its location on the European map been changed, but the variety of family forms found behind the generalized characteristics of the «Eastern» territories has made scholars re-examine certain theoretical concepts and findings.
The new concepts are based on the growing number of micro-studies covering the territories of Central and Eastern Europe and providing very detailed information on family size and structures. For Russia, which has always been considered a model of the Eastern type of household organization, new data have appeared as well, making it possible to re-examine the theories concerning Russian households.
However, scholars more often pay attention to geographic rather than social stratification of household types. The majority of studies are devoted to the social group of peasants, especially of peasant serfs, while household structures in other social groups are less explored.
In the present article we seek to fill this gap by providing a comparison of household structures in two social groups, namely of Moscow merchants and of serfs who lived near Moscow in the middle of the 19th century. The household structures in the two groups were entirely different: one in two merchant families was a nuclear one consisting of a couple with or without children, or a single parent with children, while in the peasant population complex households including several nuclear families predominated (60% of the total number of households). The most likely explanation for this are the two groups’ different obligations to the state.
Downloads
References
Blum A., I. Troitskaya, A. Avdeev (2000). Family, marriage and social control in Russia – three villages in Moscow region // Family Structures, Demography and Population. A Comparison of Societies in Asia and Europe / M. Neven and C. Capron (eds.). Liege: Laboratoire de Démographie de l’Université de Liège: 85-110.
Coale A.J. (1969).The decline of fertility in Europe from the French Revolution to World War II // Fertility and Family Planning: A World View // S.J. Behrman and L. Corsa (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 3–24.
Coale A.J., B. Anderson, E. Harm (1979). Human Fertility in Russia since the 19th Century. Princeton University Press.
Coale A.J., S.C. Watkins, eds. (1986). The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hajnal J. (1965). European marriage pattern in perspective // Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography / D.V. Glass and D.E.C. Eversley (Eds.). Aldine Publishing Company: 101-143.
Kaiser D.H. (1992). History Urban Household Composition in Early Modern Russia // The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. Vol. 23. №1: 39.
Kaser K. (2001). Serfdom in Eastern Europe // The History of the European Family. Vol.1 / D.I. Kertzer and M. Barbagli (eds.). New Haven: Yale University Press: 25-62.
Knodel J.E. (1974). The Decline of Fertility in Germany, 1871-1939. Princeton University Press.
Laslett P. (1972). Introduction: the history of the family // Household and family in past time / P. Laslett, R. Wall (eds.). Cambridge University Press: 3-89.
Laslett P. (1979). Sem’â I domohozâjstvo: istoričeskij podhod [Family and household: historical approach] // Bračnost’, roždaemost’, sem’âza tri veka [Nuptiality, fertility, family during three centuries]. Мoskva: Statistika: 132-157.
Lesthaeghe R.J. (1977).The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800-1970. Princeton University Press.
Livi Bacci M. (1971). A Century of Portuguese Fertility. Princeton University Press.
Livi Bacci M. (1977). A History of Italian Fertility during the Last Two Centuries. Princeton University Press.
Mitterauer M. (2003). European kinship systems and household structures: medieval origins // Distinct inheritances. Property, family and community in a changing Europe / P. Heady and H. Grandits (eds.). Munster: Lit.: 35-52.
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossijskoj Imperii, Sobranie Pervoe (1830) [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire, First collection (1830)]. Sankt-Peterburg.
Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj istoričeskij arhiv, fond «Šeremetevy, grafy», opis’ 15 «Materialy Vyhinskogo votčinnogo pravleniâ Moskovskoj gubernii» [Russian State historical archives, fond 1088 “Counts Sheremetev”, inventory 15 “Vyhino estate administration”].
Smith R.M. (1990). Monogamy, landed property and demographic regimes in pre-industrial Europe: regional contrasts and temporal stabilities // Fertility and Ressources / J. Landers and V. Reynolds (eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Szołtysek M. (2007). Central European household and family system, and the «Hajnal-Mitterauer» line: The parish of Bujakow (18th-19th centuries) // History of the Family. Vol.12. Issue 1: 19-42.
Tilly C. (1986). Review of the book The decline of fertility in Europe, A.J. Coale and S.C. Watkins (eds.) // Population and development Review. Vol.12. № 2 : 323-340 Todd E. (1983). La Troisième planète: Structures familiales et systèmes idéologiques. Paris: Seuil.
Troickaâ I. (1995). Revizii naseleniâ kak istočnik demografičeskoj informacii (metodologičeskie problemy [Revisions as a source of demographic information (metodological problems)]. Dissertaciâ na soiskanie stepeni kand. èkon. nauk [PhD thesis in Economics]. Мoskva.
Ulianova G. (2009). Female Enterpreneurs in Nineteenth-Century Russia. London: Pickering &Chatto.
Van de Walle E. (1974). The Female Population of France in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press.
