Fertility in the republic of Moldova: European trends and national particularities

  • Ольга Евсеевна Гагауз National Institute for Economic Research, Republic of Moldova
Keywords: fertility, period and cohort indicators, age-specific fertility rates, mother`s mean age at birth, cumulative fertility

Abstract

Currently, the official statistics of the Republic of Moldova, based on de jure population data that include citizens who are absent 12 months or more from the country, give underestimated total fertility rates, which has led to the country’s being classified as among those with lowest-low fertility.

Based on de facto population data and the results of the Population and Housing Census of 2014, the level and main trends in fertility dynamics are analyzed from a period and cohort perspective. The main goal of the study is to trace to what level the fertility rate has decreased in the Republic of Moldova and whether it can be considered a country with low or lowest-low fertility.

The results of the research show that the transformation of fertility is taking place according to the general model specific to most countries that have completed or are in the process of fertility transition, but is characterized by a slower pace. In the last few years, the period fertility rate has become fixed at 1.6-1.65 births per woman, whereas for cohorts that have completed or are at the end of the reproductive period it is 1.9-2.0 births per woman. Even for the youngest generations, who had reached the age of 35 at the time of the census (2014), the average number of children born exceeded 1.7. Although the average number of births was decreasing by the end of the reproductive period in the intercensal period, the average number of births per women at the age of 50 was 2.1, and the proportion of those who have not given birth to any child remains relatively low.

Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that the Republic of Moldova does not belong to the group of countries with low or lowest-low fertility, and that the preservation of a higher fertility than in other countries is determined by the predominance of the rural population in the general structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arhangeliskiy V.N. (2018). Rozhdaemost' [Natality] // Demograficheskoe razvitie postsovetskogo prostranstva: sb. statey i analiticheskikh materialov [Demographic development of the post-Soviet space: collection of articles and analytical materials] / M.B. Denisenko, R.V. Dmitreeva, V.V. Ylizarova, eds. Мoscow: Ekonomicheskiy fakul'tet MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova. 55 p. URL: https://www.econ.msu.ru/sys/raw.php?o=44887&p=attachment (accessed: 21.02.2018).

Billingsley S. (2010). The post-communist fertility puzzle // Population Research and Policy Review. 29(2): 193-231.

Buzu A., V. Lutenco (2016). Are we up to the task? Assessment report of the National Strategic Programme on Demographic security 2011-2025. Chisinau: 95.

Fokkema T., A. Liefbroer (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? // Demographic Research. 19(36): 1351–1418.

Frejka T. (2008). Overview Chapter 5: Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Demographic research volume. 9(7): 139-170. URL: http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/7/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.7 (accessed: 22.01.2018).

Frejka T. (2012). The role of contemporary childbearing postponement and recuperation in shaping period fertility trends // Comparative Population Studies. 36(4): 927-957.

Frejka T., Т. Sobotka (2008). Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement // Demographic research. 19(3):15-46. URL: http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/3/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.3. (accessed: 20.12.2017).

Frejka Т., S. Zakharov (2014). Evolyutsiya rozhdaemosti v Rossii za polveka: optika uslovnykh i real'nykh pokoleniy [Fertility trends in Russia during the past half century: period and cohort perspectives] // Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review]. 1: 106-143.

Gagauz О. (2011). Nizkaya rozhdaemost' v Moldove [Low fertility in Moldova] // Demoscop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. 457-458. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2011/0457/tema01.php (accessed: 10.01.2018).

Gagauz О. (2012). Moldova v protsesse globalizatsii nizkoy rozhdaemosti [Moldova in the process of low fertility globalization] // Demograficheskoe razvitie: vyzovy globalizatsii [Demographic development: challenges of globalization]. Sed'mye Valenteevskie chteniya [The Seventh Valenteevskiye Chteniya]. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya [International conference] (Moscow, Russia, November 15-17 2012) / V.A. Iontsev, ed. Мoscow: МАКS Press: 261-270.

Gagauz О. (2013). Moldova na puti vtorogo demograficheskogo perekhoda: strukturnye izmeneniya rozhdaemosti [Moldova on the path of the second demographic transition: structural changes in the birth rate] // Ekonomicheskiy rost v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Economic growth in the conditions of globalization]. Vip.8 [Issue 8]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, nauchnaya sessiya "Demograficheskoe razvitie: vyzovy dlya sotsial'noy politiki" [Materials of the international scientific-practical conference, scientific session " Demographic development: challenges for social policy"]. (Kishinev, 17-18 okt. 2013): 36-46.

Gagauz O. (2016). Low fertility rate and population decline // Population Situation Analysis in the Republic of Moldova / Gagauz Olga, Stratan A. et al., eds. Chisinau: 63-69. URL: http://ccd.md/en/20-principala-mod/143-population-situation-analysis-in-the-republic-of-moldova (accessed: 21.12.2017).

HFD (2018). The Human Fertility Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria). URL: www.humanfertility.org (data downloaded on 22.04.2018).

Kohler H.-P., F. Billari, J. Ortega (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. // Population and Development Review. 28(4): 641-681.

Kuijsten A. (1996). Changing family patterns in Europe: a case of divergence // European Journal of Population. 12(2): 115-143.

McDonald P. (2008). Very low fertility consequences, causes and policy approaches // The Japanese Journal of Population. 6(1). URL: http://www.ipss.go.jp/webj-ad/WebJournal.files/Population/2008_4/02mcdonald.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2017).

Myrskylä M., J. Goldstein, Y.-H.A. Cheng (2013). New cohort fertility forecasts for the developed world: rises, falls, and reversals // Population and Development Review. 39(1): 31-56.

National Centre of Public Health of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Moldova, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2014). 2012 Republic of Moldova Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey MICS, Final Report. Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.

Penina O., D.A. Jdanov, P. Grigoriev (2015). Producing reliable mortality estimates in the context of distorted population statistics: the case of Moldova // MPIDR Working Paper WP-2015-011, 35 pages (November 2015). Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.

Perelli-Harris B. (2008). Ukraine: on the border between old and new. Childbearing trends and policies: Country case studies / T. Frejka, J. Hoem, L. Toulemon, eds. Demographic Research. 19:29. 1145-1178.

Rindfuss R.R., M.K. Choe, S.R. Brauner-Otto (2016). The emergence of two distinct fertility regimes in economically advanced countries // Population Research and Policy Review. 35(3): 287-304.

Shcherbakova E.M. (2016). Demograficheskaya situatsiya v stranakh SNG, 2014 god [Demographic situation in the CIS countries, 2014 year] // Demoscop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. 675-676. URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2016/0675/barom01.php (accessed: 10.01.2018).

Sobotka T. (2003). Re-emerging diversity: rapid fertility changes in Central and Eastern Europe after the collapse of the communist regimes // Population Journal. 58(4/5):451-485.

Sobotka T. (2008). The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe // Demographic Research. 19(8): 171-224.

Sobotka T. (2011). Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989: collapse and gradual recovery // Historical Social Research. 36. 2: 246-296.

Sobotka T. (2017). Post-transitional fertility: childbearing postponement and the shift to low and unstable fertility levels // Vienna Institute of Demography Working Paper and Human Fertility Database Research Report VID WP 01/2017 and HFD RR 01/2017: 37.

Zakharov S. (2008). Russian Federation: From the first to the second demographic transition / T. Frejka, J.M. Hoem, T. Sobotka, L. Toulemon, eds. // Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: 907-972.

Zeman K., E. Beaujouan, Z. Brzozowska,T. Sobotka (2018). Cohort fertility decline in low fertility countries: Decomposition using parity progression ratios // Demographic research. 38(25): 651-690.

Zhenshchiny-migranty iz stran SNG v Rossii [Women-migrants from the CIS countries in Russia] (2011) / Е.V. Tyuryukanova, ed. Мoscow: МАКS Press. 120 p.

Published
2018-10-18
How to Cite
ГагаузО. Е. (2018). Fertility in the republic of Moldova: European trends and national particularities. Demographic Review, 5(3), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v5i3.8135
Section
Original papers